In a authorized continuing, when a lawyer raises an objection to a query they themselves posed, it is called a “lawyer objects to his personal query.” This motion successfully withdraws the query and prevents the witness from answering it. Such objections can come up for varied causes, together with the invention of latest info, a change in technique, or potential hurt to the case.
The significance of understanding this idea lies in its implications for authorized process and trial technique. By objecting to their very own query, attorneys can keep management over the circulation of data and defend their purchasers’ pursuits. It permits them to adapt to altering circumstances and keep away from potential pitfalls. Moreover, it highlights the importance of cautious planning and preparation in authorized proceedings, as attorneys should anticipate potential objections and formulate efficient methods accordingly.
